Kirgan
Sep 5, 10:23 AM
http://i56.tinypic.com/2yye9at.png
Chundles
Sep 24, 07:44 PM
Well said! Although, of course, you do realize that the OP was the 18-year-old in question, right?
Yah.
Yah.
GGJstudios
Apr 25, 03:50 PM
System Preferences > Network > AirPort > Advanced > AirPort > Preferred Networks:
282919
282919
jackiecanev2
Jun 25, 08:51 AM
Looking for a mini to use with my home theater. Mostly for .avi/.mkv playback. Intel only, combo drive is fine. Ram/HD unimportant, as I have plenty of ram and will be using an external.
Thanks :)
Thanks :)
Embed
Jan 9, 04:54 PM
*spoilers within*
Keynote now up for your consumption:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/guide/appleevents/
DAMN u got here before me
Keynote now up for your consumption:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/guide/appleevents/
DAMN u got here before me
Rt&Dzine
Mar 2, 01:05 PM
Is there a reason those charts in the opening post have to be so large?
EricNau
Sep 26, 10:40 PM
...
Give me something AOL and Google don't.
AOL just announced something that allows you to back up 5GB of data. .Mac gives you 1 GB. AOL is free, .Mac costs $99. I understand there are other features, but AOL has most of them too. It's not worth the $$ until some major improvements happen.
applerocks
Plus, I believe AOL offers unlimited email storage (in addition to the 5GB of backup space).
...I'm starting to forget why I ever gave Apple that $100.
Give me something AOL and Google don't.
AOL just announced something that allows you to back up 5GB of data. .Mac gives you 1 GB. AOL is free, .Mac costs $99. I understand there are other features, but AOL has most of them too. It's not worth the $$ until some major improvements happen.
applerocks
Plus, I believe AOL offers unlimited email storage (in addition to the 5GB of backup space).
...I'm starting to forget why I ever gave Apple that $100.
Hilmi Hamidi
Feb 3, 03:42 PM
thank you thank you thank!!! :)
If that's too big for you, try this one (http://wallpaper.skins.be/hayden-panettiere/27800/1920x1200/). Lots of sizes to choose from. :)
If that's too big for you, try this one (http://wallpaper.skins.be/hayden-panettiere/27800/1920x1200/). Lots of sizes to choose from. :)
juststranded
Oct 19, 08:52 PM
http://att.macrumors.com/contest/8EBBC4.png
maclaptop
Apr 13, 07:51 PM
Apple already released a new iPhone this year... remember? The one that works on a CDMA network!
1) You really think they would put all that work into rolling out the CDMA iPhone 4 in February then turn around 4 months later and expect these people to buy an iPhone 5?
2) You know how many pissed off Verizon people there would be? June 2012 at the earliest... ;)
1) Yes, Apple doesn't care.
2) Yes, Apple doesn't care.
Think?
Apple only cares about the bottom line, they've gone from the company that bragged they were anti-establishment, to who they are today.
The mainstream, fancy retail store building, we'll screw you at every chance, company.
I'm NOT bashing Apple, it simply is what it is. Corporate America.
There's nothing wrong with that.
1) You really think they would put all that work into rolling out the CDMA iPhone 4 in February then turn around 4 months later and expect these people to buy an iPhone 5?
2) You know how many pissed off Verizon people there would be? June 2012 at the earliest... ;)
1) Yes, Apple doesn't care.
2) Yes, Apple doesn't care.
Think?
Apple only cares about the bottom line, they've gone from the company that bragged they were anti-establishment, to who they are today.
The mainstream, fancy retail store building, we'll screw you at every chance, company.
I'm NOT bashing Apple, it simply is what it is. Corporate America.
There's nothing wrong with that.
shays992000
Feb 9, 12:30 PM
Att on facebook said you must on the Att nation 450 &900 or the family 700 or higher to qualify and it's not cost additional for the service.
This will be interesting! If this is true then AT&T is also trying to get old subscribers off of their grandfathered plans......
This will be interesting! If this is true then AT&T is also trying to get old subscribers off of their grandfathered plans......
Macdaddy1129
Sep 4, 12:51 PM
.
How do you make your dock just a black strip like you did?
How do you make your dock just a black strip like you did?
likemyorbs
Mar 16, 06:10 PM
Really? Have you read the thread? This is far from the only argument given to get rid of the death penalty.
Yes, and they're all just bleeding heart emotional responses, and i don't buy into that crap. Sorry, but my opinion on this isn't changing. Funny, the polls say non-religious people between the age of 18-29 are most likely to support the death penalty, and that's exactly where i fit.
Yes, and they're all just bleeding heart emotional responses, and i don't buy into that crap. Sorry, but my opinion on this isn't changing. Funny, the polls say non-religious people between the age of 18-29 are most likely to support the death penalty, and that's exactly where i fit.
mbl42
Dec 4, 09:33 PM
I have one, not sure if I want to sell though. Make me an offer via PM or email.
LotuSviLLe
Jul 6, 04:42 PM
I am certain I will be the only one in Mount Dora, Florida at 8:00AM on July 11, 2008 to purchase the coveted iPhone 3G.
Please someone out there prove me wrong.
Please someone out there prove me wrong.
Hilmi Hamidi
Apr 1, 06:57 AM
http://img165.imagevenue.com/loc227/th_04801_Untitled_122_227lo.jpg (http://img165.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=04801_Untitled_122_227lo.jpg)
Wallpaper (http://wallpaper.skins.be/emily-scott/38792/1920x1200/)
Wallpaper (http://wallpaper.skins.be/emily-scott/38792/1920x1200/)
gkarris
Apr 7, 10:38 PM
Overpriced. These games are ancient and most of them don't offer much gameplay at all. Plus it cost atari essentially nothing to put this app out. If they made it $0.99 for the hundred pack then it'd be no-brainer, we'd buy it just for the nostalgia alone. I could conceivably see paying up to $4.99 for the hundred pack for the very small handful of games that are actually worth playing. But $14.99 for these junky games? No way.
p.s., I'm not saying all old games are bad, quite the contrary, there are a lot of fantastic old games that still hold up well, but the atari era of games were especially crappy.
No way are they junky!
But, the Nintendo DS version require Vol. 1 & 2 for all 100, which comes to $40.
The difference is physical media, no DRM, and using a portable with REAL BUTTONS (;)) - but that's a whole other discussion... :eek:
Hopefully, it'll be on sale for $9.99 (about 10 cents/game)
p.s., I'm not saying all old games are bad, quite the contrary, there are a lot of fantastic old games that still hold up well, but the atari era of games were especially crappy.
No way are they junky!
But, the Nintendo DS version require Vol. 1 & 2 for all 100, which comes to $40.
The difference is physical media, no DRM, and using a portable with REAL BUTTONS (;)) - but that's a whole other discussion... :eek:
Hopefully, it'll be on sale for $9.99 (about 10 cents/game)
Sun Baked
Feb 15, 12:07 PM
I kept working to be the meanest member but no one ever voted for me for that. :( ;)
I haven't seen any ruffled feathers yet, except maybe on the free merchandise spammers.It's alway fun to see the problems they have trying to insert a link to www.***********crap.com and www.freeipodcrap.com
They keep having to edit their posts, and while they're still typing www.free i p o d s . c o m they're already banned and tossed in the wasteland.
So I can see why they hate you guys. :D
I haven't seen any ruffled feathers yet, except maybe on the free merchandise spammers.It's alway fun to see the problems they have trying to insert a link to www.***********crap.com and www.freeipodcrap.com
They keep having to edit their posts, and while they're still typing www.free i p o d s . c o m they're already banned and tossed in the wasteland.
So I can see why they hate you guys. :D
stridemat
May 3, 12:43 PM
You already have a few members in this thread who said they're not eligible.
So you are forming your opinion on the few members who have posted here that are ineligible.
A number of ineligible donors is not the same as a lack of eligible donors. That's basic logic.
Exactly!
So you are forming your opinion on the few members who have posted here that are ineligible.
A number of ineligible donors is not the same as a lack of eligible donors. That's basic logic.
Exactly!
SheldonCooper
Feb 3, 09:56 AM
Here's mine.
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1504/screenshot20110203atpm1.th.png (http://img692.imageshack.us/i/screenshot20110203atpm1.png/)
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1504/screenshot20110203atpm1.th.png (http://img692.imageshack.us/i/screenshot20110203atpm1.png/)
Thunderhawks
Apr 25, 08:25 AM
The White IP4 will look sick, much like how awesome the white iPad 2 looks. I think the demand will still be strong for it due to all of the September IP5 rumors, and the fact that I know tons of people that have broken old iPhone are are waiting for the white to release. I would not expect crazy demand for it, but sales should be very good.
Why do some posters put down peoples choices or even the fact that it exists in white?
So, if you don't like a white iphone, buy black. It's all good:-)
I like black, but my daughter likes white. When I asked why, she said it goes well with her white ipad and white MacBook, when they are all on her desk.
Sounds like as good a reason as any.
She has a 3GS off contract that is totally on it's last legs (broken glass replaced with plastic, battery empty mid-day), so her only decision is to wait out the next iphone or not.
Unfortunately she has never been able to wait for anything(despite me mentioning not to buy 1st gen Apple products), so she'll probably buy the ip4 in white.
I bet there are many people out there in the same situation.
Why do some posters put down peoples choices or even the fact that it exists in white?
So, if you don't like a white iphone, buy black. It's all good:-)
I like black, but my daughter likes white. When I asked why, she said it goes well with her white ipad and white MacBook, when they are all on her desk.
Sounds like as good a reason as any.
She has a 3GS off contract that is totally on it's last legs (broken glass replaced with plastic, battery empty mid-day), so her only decision is to wait out the next iphone or not.
Unfortunately she has never been able to wait for anything(despite me mentioning not to buy 1st gen Apple products), so she'll probably buy the ip4 in white.
I bet there are many people out there in the same situation.
iApples
Mar 28, 12:46 AM
glad you corrected that to seller ... earlier you were hoping the buyer gets scammed
I actually meant buyer. That was a typo. Fixed that. I'm not saying I want the seller to receive the money (because we all know PayPal won't let that happen) but the buyer does deserves to lose his money for his own stupidity.
If you go on the buyers eBay profile and look at his previous bids.. they're almost all on phones. Seems a bit fishy to me...
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 1 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 2 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 3 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 4 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 5 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Other 1 Seller 6 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 7 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 8 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 9 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 10 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 11 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 12 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 13 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 14 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 15 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 16 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 17 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 18 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 19 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 20 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 21 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 22 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 23 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 24 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 25 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 24 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 26 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 27 <1h
I actually meant buyer. That was a typo. Fixed that. I'm not saying I want the seller to receive the money (because we all know PayPal won't let that happen) but the buyer does deserves to lose his money for his own stupidity.
If you go on the buyers eBay profile and look at his previous bids.. they're almost all on phones. Seems a bit fishy to me...
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 1 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 2 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 3 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 4 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 5 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Other 1 Seller 6 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 7 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 8 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 9 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 10 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 11 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 12 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 13 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 14 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 15 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 16 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 17 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 18 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 19 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 20 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 21 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 22 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 23 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 24 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 25 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 24 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phone & PDA Accessories 1 Seller 26 <1h
Cell Phones & PDAs > Cell Phones & Smartphones 1 Seller 27 <1h
Lord Blackadder
Jan 10, 05:06 PM
They make not tinker with it too much, though they did try to take it a bit down market in its last revision. They may just stick to the four door sedans, since they tend to be the biggest sellers. The ironic part is that people laughed when VW tried to move upscale in the 90s, more into the luxury market. Now people are giving them flak for trying to make their stuff more affordable.
Back in the 90s, auto magazines in the US criticized the Jetta for being too small (similar criticisms were leveled at the underrated Mondeo sold here as the Contour). I always like the in-between size of the Jetta, but apparently most Americans prefer larger cars.
I would like to think I'm wrong, but most Americans seem to correlate size and quality, i.e. bigger cars are better. People can't understand why anyone would buy a smaller car when a bigger one could be had at the same price.
Back in the 90s, auto magazines in the US criticized the Jetta for being too small (similar criticisms were leveled at the underrated Mondeo sold here as the Contour). I always like the in-between size of the Jetta, but apparently most Americans prefer larger cars.
I would like to think I'm wrong, but most Americans seem to correlate size and quality, i.e. bigger cars are better. People can't understand why anyone would buy a smaller car when a bigger one could be had at the same price.
nefan65
Dec 22, 11:47 AM
I support PCs and servers in my job, along with Macs as we're a mixed shop.
I can say without a shadow of a doubt what you put down has little basis in reality. Yes, windows machines take longer to boot up, but not always because of the the antivirus software.
They take longer because IT (me and my co workers) we make sure that group policies are pushed out on every reboot, so the machines are fairly locked down. We also push out updates to software automatically and also yes do virus scans.
For IT to take macs serious, they will need to easily apply group policies to the computer remotely and automatically. Have applications available that allows them to update client applications.
The cost of such is generally to a degree that makes using macs not feasible.
btw, I get just as many calls regarding problems with macs as I do with PCs. In fact many enterprise applications have some major compatibility issues with Safari.
Total Cost of Ownership, up time, training support and efficiencies all point to using PCs over a Mac.
Just because apple fanboys say its cheaper in the long run means its true, quite the opposite. Asset depreciation of Macs is the same as PCs, so there's no financial incentive for a business to hold on to a mac longer then a PC, and actually its negative to hold on to an asset when its fully depreciated even if its still functional. This throws the idea that macs last longer out the door when dealing with business and depreciation
So why buy a computer that costs 2x more then another, has less ability to support/manage remotely. Has the same level of support required, i.e., support calls for users who need help, has some serious compatibility issues with some enterprise applications and also requires a fair amount of re-training for both the users and support staff.
The last paragraph is your opinion and experience. As for full depreciation; what are you talking about? I've yet to meet a CFO that cares about using a desktop system that's completely depreciated. In your scenario, it's off the books, so throw it out the window...? You're right, most PC's/Laptops are fully depreciated at the end of 3 years, so there is no advantage for Mac over a PC. That's where a lot businesses AND IT people miss the boat. That's why there's more and more push to Cloud [Private as it relates to this] for applications allowing staff to use what they want. Having a narrow minded approach like this in business will cripple it. The true cost of savings is not having to push out applications, or install applications on 100's of systems. It's publishing the apps to be used on anything; PC, Laptop, Mac, Linux, Tablets, Phones, etc...
I can say without a shadow of a doubt what you put down has little basis in reality. Yes, windows machines take longer to boot up, but not always because of the the antivirus software.
They take longer because IT (me and my co workers) we make sure that group policies are pushed out on every reboot, so the machines are fairly locked down. We also push out updates to software automatically and also yes do virus scans.
For IT to take macs serious, they will need to easily apply group policies to the computer remotely and automatically. Have applications available that allows them to update client applications.
The cost of such is generally to a degree that makes using macs not feasible.
btw, I get just as many calls regarding problems with macs as I do with PCs. In fact many enterprise applications have some major compatibility issues with Safari.
Total Cost of Ownership, up time, training support and efficiencies all point to using PCs over a Mac.
Just because apple fanboys say its cheaper in the long run means its true, quite the opposite. Asset depreciation of Macs is the same as PCs, so there's no financial incentive for a business to hold on to a mac longer then a PC, and actually its negative to hold on to an asset when its fully depreciated even if its still functional. This throws the idea that macs last longer out the door when dealing with business and depreciation
So why buy a computer that costs 2x more then another, has less ability to support/manage remotely. Has the same level of support required, i.e., support calls for users who need help, has some serious compatibility issues with some enterprise applications and also requires a fair amount of re-training for both the users and support staff.
The last paragraph is your opinion and experience. As for full depreciation; what are you talking about? I've yet to meet a CFO that cares about using a desktop system that's completely depreciated. In your scenario, it's off the books, so throw it out the window...? You're right, most PC's/Laptops are fully depreciated at the end of 3 years, so there is no advantage for Mac over a PC. That's where a lot businesses AND IT people miss the boat. That's why there's more and more push to Cloud [Private as it relates to this] for applications allowing staff to use what they want. Having a narrow minded approach like this in business will cripple it. The true cost of savings is not having to push out applications, or install applications on 100's of systems. It's publishing the apps to be used on anything; PC, Laptop, Mac, Linux, Tablets, Phones, etc...