.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

dave honey badger randall

dave honey badger randall. the honey badger randall.
  • the honey badger randall.



  • maccompaq
    Jan 5, 09:08 AM
    I don't use AV software on my Windows computers nor will I use it on my Macs.
    And believe it or not, I have not had an infection in all the years (many) that I have been on the net.





    dave honey badger randall. dave honey badger randall.
  • dave honey badger randall.



  • Thunderhawks
    Apr 20, 07:04 AM
    I hope they call it the iPhone 4S or something like that instead of iPhone 5

    May your "hopes"be fulfilled and then some:-)

    As long as it does what I want it to do they can call it anything they want.





    dave honey badger randall. the honey badger randall. who
  • the honey badger randall. who



  • Don't panic
    May 4, 04:57 PM
    It's closer to 700.

    but she is heavenly :)

    btw, love the name selections
    haven't figured out wilmer and rosius, though.





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. honey
  • honey badger randall. honey



  • spazzcat
    Mar 29, 09:03 AM
    At least it works on the market leading platform. ;)




    dave honey badger randall. dave honey badger randall
  • dave honey badger randall



  • bella92108
    Apr 5, 02:22 PM
    It's: "Do not buy iPhone. Go with Android." That's how I see it. Companies like Toyota will have no choice but to double their efforts in serving Android users.

    They pushed me away, I'm Android on my phone, iPad 2 on my tablet. If I can't jailbreak my iPad 2 in the next week, HELLO ANDROID XOOM :-)





    dave honey badger randall. the honey badger randall.
  • the honey badger randall.



  • shiv
    Sep 16, 12:38 PM
    As long as they at least announce the 17" MBP C2D, I'll be happy, even if it isn't immediately available.

    They released the C2D iMACS altogether. I would be really surprised if they didn't do AT LEAST the same to their pro line-ups.





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall
  • honey badger randall



  • itcheroni
    Apr 21, 12:50 AM
    I'd love it if you could point out where you addressed this, because as a tax accountant, I'm having a hard time thinking of a time when a realized capital gain isn't income - if you have a realized net gain (ie amount realized is greater than your basis in the capital asset), you certainly have income. Certainly you could reinvest that net gain, but that doesn't mean you don't have income, that just means you realized a gain and reinvested the old basis and the gain (income). You're only taxed on realized gains that are recognized by the code (and you can net against realized losses) - sure, I could have an unrealized capital gain that isn't income, but I wouldn't be taxed on it either. Not that I don't agree with some of your points, but I'd really love the same clarification on this that most other posters have been asking for.

    I suppose what you are getting at as a trader is that you buy a capital asset for $1000 and sell two days latter for $1100, then reinvest the $1100 into another capital asset. You'd be taxed on the $100 of capital gain even though you effectively have no cash in your hands to pay the tax. Unfortunately for traders, income doesn't mean cash. But a person who was in the trade or business of being a professional trader wouldn't qualify for capital gains treatment anyways, it would all be ordinary income.

    Okay, but just for you, dude (when you disagree with me, we both can at least understand what we're disagreeing on. Other people here, well, it's just a waste of time. They start responding before even understanding my point). I guess I didn't make it clear earlier but my perspective on capital gains is in relation to inflation. If there were 100 widgets and 100 dollars, let's say the value of one widget was 1 dollar. If the central bank in charge of dollars decides to do some quantitative easing and increases the money supply to 200 dollars. This will lead to inflation with one widget valued at approximately 2 dollars. Now, why should one pay capital gains on this when, most likely, everything else costs more too. You didn't really receive any gain; the measurement of value (dollars) decreased.

    For example, let's say there was a tax for getting taller. If the measurement of an inch or foot keeps decreasing, you will have to keep paying even though you're not getting taller.

    Earlier I gave an example of the time between buying an apple and biting into it, likening it to cost basis and realized gain. We would find it ridiculous to pay a tax for any capital gain in the apple, but if I choose to save my money in gold until I use it, most people think I'm actually gaining something. If I were holding stock in a company that paid dividends, that might be different.

    So from my perspective, the inflation (capital gain) itself is a tax, and we have to pay a tax for that tax. Right now, I don't believe the economy is really improving; the Fed is just creating enough inflation to improve the numbers. Stocks may be going up, but I think food prices are going up even faster. So what is the point of a capital gains on stocks if the proceeds from the sale nets you even less groceries than at the time of your cost basis? If a 1 ounce gold coin a hundred years ago buys you roughly the same today, what is the point of charging a capital gains? In this case, the coin would have gone from $20 to $1500, adding up to a capital gain of $1480. Sure, you could have save the $20 in cash instead of gold, but then you're "taxed" by inflation. Instead of paying your rent for several months, $20 will now buy you a haircut. Forget the "tax the rich" aspect of this; this makes it really difficult for poor people to save money because they are the ones most likely to save cash.

    My concern is, how will we save our purchasing power? The government is actively decreasing the value of our money and anything we do to try and save our purchasing power is stripped away by taxes.





    dave honey badger randall. dave honey badger randall.
  • dave honey badger randall.



  • AaronEdwards
    Apr 26, 03:30 PM
    You don't hear about Ferrari and Porsche worrying about their market share. Neither should Apple. Let the other guys squabble in the lower end of the market leaving Apple to continue to deliver a premium product and user experience.

    Fiat owns 85% of Ferrari.
    Volkswagen owns 49.9% of Porsche.





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. the
  • honey badger randall. the



  • Chef Medeski
    Jul 21, 11:40 PM
    Apple can't not update at least the top-end MacBooks.
    Wow, that only took 5 minutes for me to understand.

    You mean Apple has to update.... you know that whole double negative thing





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. who is
  • honey badger randall. who is



  • SeaFox
    Nov 26, 06:02 PM
    2002 called, they want their platform idea back. :rolleyes:

    Seriously, does anyone here even hear about tablet PCs anymore? Nope.
    What happened with Microsoft Origami? Nothing.
    What are people wanting to use for computing on the go? A smart phone.

    Apple didn't get involved when this was "the rage" and I couldn't be happier. The idea never became anything more than a niche product in health care, manufacturing, and perhaps education. It bombed. And Apple wasn't left holding the bag on a bunch of unsold product. Another "failure in this companies beleaguered history" as it would be used as fodder in the press.





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. honey badger randall wiki
  • honey badger randall. honey badger randall wiki



  • maclaptop
    Apr 20, 06:37 AM
    This will definitely be the first iteration of the iPhone that I will pass on. It's certainly not much of an upgrade from the iPhone 4.

    This model promises to be one that many will pass on.

    I certainly will.

    Even though it's already well known that it will have a better antenna to fix the antennagate issue that most everyone denied.

    The lack of a fresh new look will keep me away, especially retaining the tiny screen. Seems like Apples coasting this time around.

    A faster processor? Big deal, who needs it, a waste of money just to pump up Apples coffers.

    A true disappointment, this one is. I was so eager to dump my antennagate special.





    dave honey badger randall. dave honey badger randall. Badger-Hockey-505; Badger-Hockey-505. ~Shard~. Jul 14, 02:45 PM. Also, think about what apple would be doing
  • dave honey badger randall. Badger-Hockey-505; Badger-Hockey-505. ~Shard~. Jul 14, 02:45 PM. Also, think about what apple would be doing



  • Floris
    Apr 20, 01:41 AM
    I honestly can not imagine why.

    This is the 3gs to the 3th gen iPhone?

    Man, imagine just buying one from verizon, don't you feel f* for not waiting a month.

    Useless for them to release another one this year. Enjoy the spoils of everybody buying it. And release a 'real worthy' upgrade to iPhone5 for early 2012 release.





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall.
  • honey badger randall.



  • reezer
    Apr 20, 12:37 AM
    Personally, I think that iP4 is the most aesthetically pleasing phone on the market. I'm not surprised to hear they will not change the design because the transition from 3G to 3Gs was similar.

    The faster processor isn't necessarily a good enough reason for me to upgrade because the apps that I use regularly perform more than adequately on my iP4 (probably on 3G/3Gs models too). If I decide to start shooting more video (and editing it) or do other heavy lifting on my phone I will consider upgrading.

    That being said, I think it is important for Apple to upgrade to a dual core processor, increase the memory, and make it capable of using at least one 4G network to compete with the latest Android based phones on the market.





    dave honey badger randall. who is honey badger randall.
  • who is honey badger randall.



  • BlizzardBomb
    Jul 23, 05:59 AM
    I posted this question in another thread but no one has answered it, so... I was wondering what thoughts you had on this:

    Will this upgrade to Core 2 Duo be considered a RevB strictly speaking, for the iMacs? I mean, since it's a new generation of Intel chip as opposed to a speed bump of an existing chip, is it likely to cause any unknown bugs or dramas that the Core Duos didn't?

    I'm in the market for a new iMac when they put the new chips in, but I want to be confident that this time they'll have ironed out all the bugs from the initial release of Intel iMacs, plus not be likely to have new bugs caused by the new architecture of the Core 2 Duos.

    Thoughts?

    Chuck.

    If iMacs get Merom its highly likely there'll be 0 new problems. If they get Conroe there is a very very small possibility of heat issues.





    dave honey badger randall. who is honey badger randall.
  • who is honey badger randall.



  • iphoneIA
    Mar 28, 09:52 AM
    Sort of relieved no iPhone 5 announcements, Im firmly bogged down into a 2 year contract.

    I have to agree with this one. I have a two year contract and seeing a new iPhone would tempt my wallet.





    dave honey badger randall. dave honey badger randall. Badger-Hockey-506; Badger-Hockey-506. spazzcat. Mar 22, 01:40 PM. This is just a preview of the future,
  • dave honey badger randall. Badger-Hockey-506; Badger-Hockey-506. spazzcat. Mar 22, 01:40 PM. This is just a preview of the future,



  • HecubusPro
    Sep 15, 06:38 PM
    Some has to say it:

    If MacOSXRumors is predicting it, then it's never going to happen.

    I thought macrumors just culls rumors from other sites, rather than producing stories/rumors themselves.

    EDIT: Sorry... didn't see the huge "OSX" in between "Mac" and "Rumors." :)





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. honey
  • honey badger randall. honey



  • caspersoong
    Apr 23, 07:57 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

    This is really nice. But is it really necessary? How many ppi will it be?





    dave honey badger randall. honey badger randall. honey
  • honey badger randall. honey



  • 425
    Mar 27, 03:47 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    I just forked over 750 dollars for an ipad 2 and ipad 3 is coming out? Ouch!!! I already want it.

    No. I wish this stupid rumor would die. I guarantee you the iPad 3 does not arrive until 2012. Most likely March





    dave honey badger randall. the honey badger randall. who
  • the honey badger randall. who



  • 0815
    Apr 18, 04:06 PM
    Is the law suit really about the 'looks' ?

    Ok, after reading a bit more about this law suit it seems to be really more or less about the 'look and feel' .... while it is probably annoying for Apple that they decided for a very similar look and feel, I'm not sure that this is enough for a law suit - not that I know much about patent law, but it just sounds stupid.





    aarond12
    Apr 5, 01:55 PM
    I'm all for the freedom of jailbreaking, but I also have to be realistic: If I am a Scion fan (I'm not) and want this theme on my iPhone, I have to jailbreak it. If I mess something up and end up bricking my iPhone, can I blame Toyota? Not likely.

    This seems less like a freedom issue and more of a liability issue.





    0010101
    Nov 25, 10:14 PM
    Apple could very easily set up their 'own' cell network.. the same way Virgin Mobile, TracPhone, and several other cell phone companies have done.

    Not by building towers and cell sites.. but by buying blocks of numbers from an existing large carrier and rebranding it as their own.

    Of course, for voice and text usage, this gets expensive for the customer.. but for things like downloads of video and music files, they could simply tack on a 'wireless' surcharge.

    For instance, a particular iTunes song could cost say.. $2 if downloaded with a computer.. but $2.50 if downloaded 'direct to iPod'.

    It would work very simular to the way those 'pre-paid' cell phones work. You buy the iPod from the store, no contract to sign, no comitments. Take it home and 'activate' it for wireless access, then pay for what you download, and pay nothing if you never use the wireless features.

    iPod wireless. Don't talk. Listen.

    Send me a free 17" MacBook Pro and you can have that slogan, Steve!

    That makes perfect sense to me. Especially since the data center Apple just bought would be the perfect rig of the increased download demand, as well as billing for such a service.





    cube
    May 6, 02:33 AM
    The headline is wrong.

    The rumor is NOT that they would abandon Intel. The claim being made is that they would switch from x86 to ARM.





    Machead III
    Sep 11, 06:47 AM
    Jeez, why do people think Apple will make the movie store/movie management part of iTunes? That would be the worst decision ever, the two mediums and two markets are so vastly different they need two seperate apps!

    If Apple can just release an iTunes-like app combining Delicious Library style management with playback and the movie store, they've got a winner.

    Bungle it in with the music store like they do with TV shows and keep the horrific video management in iTunes to manage them and a lot of people will be sick of it before long.





    danpass
    May 7, 02:21 PM
    Over the air syncing for iWork documents on the iPad?

    I just started using it. More like online storage.

    I'm not yet certain if it syncs dropbox style but doesn't look that way so far (to me)