.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

megan fox tattoos 2011

megan fox tattoos 2011. tattoos middot; Megan Foxs
  • tattoos middot; Megan Foxs



  • notabadname
    Apr 26, 02:47 PM
    Apple isn't forced to allow iOS only on their own devices.

    Besides, Apple is doing the same thing with OS X, it's made for Macs only, and people have always been comparing their sales against Windows.

    Seems to me you're just bitter about it.

    No bitterness. Simply a background in statistics and their relevance. This one is not relevant. Apple is not a software company really. It is a hardware company that creates software for its hardware. It has never tried to offer it's software as an install option on other hardware, and in-fact has challenged installation of it's software on PC's. You can either be intelligent enough to recognize and compare runners in the same race or you can't. Apple is not in the race to install its OS on any hardware other than its own. It is pretty naive to benchmark a "runner" in a race in which it is not running. If you would measure your personal performance against people not competing against you, would say that is a valid measure? I am a pilot, and to say I am a better pilot than my neighbor (not a pilot) would be a pretty empty and laughable bragging point for me to make.

    We don't hear much argument on here about how many more phones Apple sells than Google, because Google does not sell a phone (anymore). So why is it anymore valid to compare how many installs of the iOS there are across global hardware as compared to Android, when Apple provides its iOS to ZERO hardware manufacturers, and Android provides it to all takers. Again, to benchmark the "winner" of a competition, both runners need to be in the race.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox With Her Latest
  • Megan Fox With Her Latest



  • kevink2
    May 6, 06:23 AM
    Wouldn't a new CPU have to be much faster than the equivalent Intel chip to make it worthwhile? Not just equivalent. Wouldn't it have to be able to run previous generation software in emulation for a period of years.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos 2011. hottest,megan fox tattoos; hottest,megan fox tattoos
  • megan fox tattoos 2011. hottest,megan fox tattoos; hottest,megan fox tattoos



  • mwayne85
    Apr 25, 09:44 AM
    Good observation, but as others have said, this won't happen anytime soon. I guessing we'll see a resolution bump in the iPad before we see it in Macs.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos back. megan
  • megan fox tattoos back. megan



  • Josias
    Sep 15, 05:28 PM
    I know this is half off topic, but I posted my predictions for Photokina in another thread here (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=2836900#post2836900).

    I would gladly bet my MacBook that they announce new MBP's on the 25th.;)





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox armani jeans 2011 ad
  • megan fox armani jeans 2011 ad



  • ericinboston
    Mar 28, 10:58 AM
    Not cool. Coming from an iPhone 3GS, I seriously don't want to wait.

    Same here...I don't need it Day 1 but I don't want to wait till 2012 when my contract expires in Sept...I can go month-to-month but was really looking forward to a phone with more storage and better video/camera. By Sept/Oct there will be a lot of Androids to try...ditto for 2012.

    I also want to see sometime this year a new iPod Classic and maybe a new Mini. iMac would be nice but they are still too pricey for my blood since 90% of the stuff I/we use our computers for are web-driven tasks (email, bills, web surfing, photo sharing, family blogs/website, etc).





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos side. her
  • megan fox tattoos side. her



  • AaronEdwards
    Apr 26, 04:03 PM
    Right and what is your point?

    If they weren't making money they would be sold off or shut down. They are high end cars sold to the rich. But let me guess you are stupid to buy an over priced Apple or iProduct right? Just like anyone that buys a BMW, Ferrari or Porsche is dumb. What is dumb is thinking one product is better than another. What is better, the iPhone, Android or a Star Tec? I guess if the only thing I want to do is make phone calls my old Star Tec is the best if it still works. My point is it depends on what your needs are.

    About that guess. I didn't argue that it's dumb to buy an Apple product. Nor that it's dumb to buy a Ferrari or Porsche. Nice try.

    My point was that they are now owned or mergining with other companies. Porsche had a �9 billion debt. They weren't making enough money. I bet they were worrying about the future though.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. MEGAN FOX MAKEUP 2011. milo
  • MEGAN FOX MAKEUP 2011. milo



  • johnnyturbouk
    Apr 6, 06:21 PM
    What a joke of a tablet. Nothing but a piece of crap.

    lmao

    +1

    back yo my precious (ipad)





    megan fox tattoos 2011. viernes 6 de mayo de 2011
  • viernes 6 de mayo de 2011



  • milo
    Sep 11, 11:05 AM
    As for the movie store...I think I remember SJ in an interview awhile back saying, while he likes the purchase model for music, movies lend themselves to the subscription model because most people only watch a movie once or twice, Star Wars geeks notwithstanding. So I think the movie store is going to be like a true movie store. If you want to buy a movie you can, but the emphasis will be more on a NetFlix type model. A $15/mo sub gets you 3 movies at a time, unlimited d/ls per mo. Alternatively, you could rent a single movie for $4, viewable for a week or so. For people who don't have time to convert a DVD to an iPod viewable format that makes sense. Buying for $15 or $10 isn't going to excite anyone I don't think.

    I doubt a download service would be able to offer unlimited movie downloads, at least not for a price next to netflix. Netflix "unlimited" movies really aren't because they are limited by the speed of the post office (and artificially limited even more by Netflix if you watch too many).





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos marilyn
  • megan fox tattoos marilyn



  • jabooth
    Jul 30, 06:54 PM
    I'm with the few who feel it will be SIM free.

    Think about it - cracking into the cell phone market is a complex business. I know apple has money but setting up their own service??

    Thats a serious gamble....

    Seems much more likely to me that they would make a phone that you can just order from the apple store and shove your SIM card in.

    People think nothing of spending �200+ on an ipod - why would buying an ipod with intergrated phone features seem any different?? (if properly priced).

    Also, with simply making the hardware apple can easily sell overseas - UK networks are GSM just like USA and the rest of Europe. They can mass produce one product and sell it at both sides of the Atlantic - then they can sign on with individual providers and sell the 'iphone' it the more traditional light with contracts.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos marilyn
  • megan fox tattoos marilyn



  • Daveoc64
    May 4, 02:49 PM
    How so?

    The current method is "the OS DVD you buy can be used anywhere, as often as you like, forever."

    How could it be worse than that?

    The licence is only for one computer.

    If you want to install it on a different machine you must uninstall the original copy first.

    The Mac App Store says:

    "You can install apps on every Mac you use and even download them again."

    That implies that if I go on a friend's computer for 5 minutes once a year I could install Lion on it for no charge.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox Giorgio Armani 2011
  • Megan Fox Giorgio Armani 2011



  • ferrous
    Apr 5, 01:58 PM
    What is Apple's business in Toyota's advertisement? Jailbroken or not, WTF? It's not like it's a public iPhone burning ceremony.... THAT would be awful! :D





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos what they
  • megan fox tattoos what they



  • cube
    May 6, 06:41 AM
    But until Intel releases technology using the new transistors people dumped arm stocks for essentially hype,(?) Which is why I'm surprised.

    I'm not surprised about people getting overhyped. Just look the "3D" thread here.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox#39;s forearm tattoo—a
  • Megan Fox#39;s forearm tattoo—a



  • ptysell
    Apr 26, 03:59 PM
    Android could gain the other 36% of the market and it would still make less money in a year than Apple makes off iTunes alone in a quarter.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. megan fox tattoos marilyn.
  • megan fox tattoos marilyn.



  • wclyffe
    Dec 10, 01:34 PM
    Just a quick post that I thought was noteworthy! Here is a Youtube video showing a guy putting an iPhone WITH A CASE ON IT into the Tomtom Car Kit, and its fine. Granted, its not a full case, but I heard you could have no case at all, so at least it offers some protection to the back of the phone.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nR46AFeRVU





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox Giorgio Armani
  • Megan Fox Giorgio Armani



  • diamond.g
    May 4, 02:45 PM
    I wish Apple would sell the USB key + Lion. I think their Key is nifty...





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox, Marilyn Monroe
  • Megan Fox, Marilyn Monroe



  • ineedamac
    Mar 26, 10:53 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Maybe I'm missing something. I don't get all of the comments that iOS 4.3 is so outdated and in need of a major overhaul. I like 4.3. It works for me.

    I like the notification system. An applet pops up when I have a notification and I can choose to ignore it or go into the app for more information. What is wrong with that? I'm all for doing things better and maybe someone can show me a better way.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox Tattoo a Honker. by
  • Megan Fox Tattoo a Honker. by



  • kdarling
    Apr 20, 09:31 AM
    Faster or lower power CPU = hopefully something more cpu hungry in the OS.

    Widgets would be nice.

    Whatever the new feature is, we already know from history that it probably won't be allowed to run on older models, even if they do get the token OS version upgrade.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. Megan Fox is slowly,
  • Megan Fox is slowly,



  • AidenShaw
    Mar 30, 09:07 PM
    And what do you mean by a 64-bit [file]system?

    The main hallmark of a 64-bit filesystem is that you can have files that are larger than (4GiB-1) - or (2GiB-1) if the filesystem treats offsets as signed integers.

    Another area where 64-bit filesystems show up is in the total volume size - if the filesystem uses 32-bits for sector addressing you'll have a maximum volume size of (2TiB-512).

    If your filesystem has issues with files bigger than 4 GiB (or 2GiB), and has issues with volumes bigger than 2 TiB - you have some 32-bit issues in your filesystem.





    megan fox tattoos 2011. 2011 wrist tattoos for girls
  • 2011 wrist tattoos for girls



  • thisisahughes
    Apr 20, 10:04 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    I want A5 chip, 64 GB, white version.


    yes.





    drakino
    Apr 5, 01:48 PM
    Leave the jailbreak community alone Apple!! What is your ****ing problem??? Can't we just coexist???:mad:

    Not in the current form. Jailbreaking is possible only due to exploits discovered in iOS and it's supporting boot code. It would be irresponsible for Apple to ignore these exploits, as they leave the products vulnerable to other attacks. Apple wants to sell the iPhone and iPad in the enterprise market as well, and would much prefer to be secure enough to do so. Jailbreaking can also open the device to even more exploits, unless the end user doing the hack fully comprehends what is being done.

    As others pointed out, this is Apple simply asking Toyota to stop. Toyota was publicly supporting jailbreaking, and this could lead to more people attempting it. When something goes wrong, the less tech savvy people may wander into an Apple store to try and fix the problem. By tying up the support people, it causes other legitimate customers to wait longer, leading to dissatisfaction all around.





    Guitar geek
    Aug 4, 12:01 AM
    This is great and bad at the same time for me. I'm so happy that they'll finally move to Merom. However, I've been holding off an MBP since mid-April. I was really hoping to get one after WWDC. If it's true that they may launch it in September, I may not be able to get it in time for school, and the ipod rebate may be over.





    err404
    Apr 5, 04:30 PM
    Android is still open... They are just going to be much more tighter on what Products qualify to get the google Logo and the android name.

    I mostly agree. The design philosophy will leave it more open then iOS, but the reality for most users is that their subsidized handsets are compromised in openness. Without rooting, functions like tethering or updated ROMs require carrier approval. At the same time rooting itself is discouraged or prevented by most manufactures (rather, they are trying to prevent). Even Google themselves require specific standards be met for access to critical closed apps like the Market Place. Android isn't very compelling w/o Google's closed source apps like Nav.
    It's more then the logo and name. The core Android experience all but requires manufactures sacrificing control to Google.





    cycomiko
    Apr 6, 06:00 PM
    So...10 pages+ of comments around 100,000 unit claim

    Official comments from the droid developers around 0.2% share of OS

    So 50,000,000 android OS based devices

    Gartner shows 67million android based smartphones sold last year alone....

    which butthole did htey pull their 100k figure from?





    heisetax
    Nov 22, 07:47 AM
    The problem with Palm is they are on their way out. They got what? Treo? How long can that last? PDAs are over. So it's all about the phones now.

    They have to be worried. Apple has the midas touch. Whatever Apple get's into they change. Apple has a way of innovation that changes all of the dynamics. They weren't the first with the iPod, but their entrance into digital music has changed the whole music industry, not just digital music players.

    Apple could very well do the same thing with an Apple branded phone. Integrating it into the whole computer experiance in ways we can't even predict. To claim it takes years to make a phone "right" is just proof that Palm has very little to offer.

    The future of phone technology is going to change rapidly and dramically over the next few years. Apple can make billions of dollars in this market. They are going to go for it, and they will leverage their existing products to make it happen and to offer something new. Everyone is fixated on the iPod, but it's the integration with OS X that has the most interesting potential.

    Video iChat on your phone? Internet services? Email? Address? Calendar? Have you used a Palm or Blackberry? They are OK for what they do, but they could be so much better...a lot better. What they are missing is exactly what Apple has to offer -- and it isn't music.



    I know that many Blue Tooth features of my Motorola cell phone is disabled by Verizon. Even if Apple would make the best cell phone possible, how many of those great featues do you think the cell phone companies would actually allow the use of.

    Remember simple things like ring tones, photos & such could easilly be transferred from the cell phone to your home computer. But this is not usually allowed. Could this be because the cell phone companies allow these features only to add to their revenue stream, not to give the cell phone user some additional user or usuable feature?

    Unless the an Apple cell phone was available from all cell phone service providers & without many of the cell phone features disabled, do you think that it could be a success?

    Bill the TaxMan